Results from the DRM FTC debate

This item was filled under [ Spore, The Sims 2 Series, Video Games ]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/US-FederalTradeCommission-Seal.svg/150px-US-FederalTradeCommission-Seal.svg.pngYesterday was a busy day in Seattle, with the Federal Trades Commission holding a hearing on DRM found on various electronic devices.  It was a pretty good turnout according to a few articles.  A representative from our very own “Reclaim your Game” (congrats you guys :D ) attended the event, even had the chance to make a few points regarding SecuROM and other obtrusive DRM’s.

FTC has a role to play in easing burden of DRM. Helping consumers understand what they’re buying, and helping them get what they pay for. Consumers are beginning to expect that products containing DRM will harm them, and that’s not good for either consumers or the content industries.

He researches security of DRM systems. At one time research was primarily around security of content, but there’s an emerging area of collateral damage caused by DRM measures. DRM has a tendency to create security risks beyond that presented by typical consumer software. Brings up the Sony rootkit, and a videogame DRM system called Safe Disk, which had a security bug and the software had kernel-level access to Windows systems. Automatic updates without notification, “phoning home” without notification, are also issues that reduce the users’ understanding and control.

I’m still digest the information from all of the articles, but you can start reading yourself of the event from the following sites:

Rate this topic:
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Popularity: 282 views
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Comment on “Results from the DRM FTC debate”

  • Jfed
    26 March, 2009, 17:11

    Thanks so much for the links, Jud! I’m really hopeful that the consumer will be *at least* considered where DRM is concerned, and that the FTC seems to have a grasp on the situation.
    I think all anyone wants is to feel safe buying and installing software, and this puts publishers on notice. Thanks again. :)

Leave a Comment